Why are more clinically relevant in vitro methods needed?

Delivered dose uniformity and APSD measurement are established methods for characterising inhaled products under standardised conditions. These methods are essential for generating repeatable and comparable data, but they do not reproduce every aspect of product use by a patient.

Differences in mouth-throat geometry, inhalation profile, device handling and the conditions encountered after deposition can all affect drug delivery and uptake. More clinically representative methods can help product developers investigate these factors, compare test and reference products under a wider range of conditions and generate data that better supports an understanding of in vivo performance.

Better IVIVCs do not replace compendial testing. They provide complementary information that can support product development, bioequivalence assessment and the interpretation of in vivo studies.

The evolving role of enhanced in vitro methods

FDA product-specific guidances (PSGs) for certain orally inhaled and nasal drug products increasingly reference enhanced in vitro approaches for bioequivalence assessment.

Depending on the individual guidance, these approaches may include realistic APSD measurement, inhaled dissolution testing and other product-characterisation studies. Together, they reflect a broader move towards generating more sensitive and clinically relevant in vitro evidence alongside established testing methods.

Requirements remain specific to the product and guidance concerned, so laboratories should always consult the current PSG when developing their testing strategy.

Explore the regulatory background

Two complementary areas of testing

No single in vitro test describes the complete journey of an inhaled drug. Realistic APSD and inhaled dissolution provide complementary information about aerosol deposition and post-deposition behaviour. Used alongside established product-characterisation methods, they can help build a more complete understanding of product performance.

1. Realistic APSD (rAPSD)

Investigate product performance under more representative conditions

Realistic APSD measurement builds on established cascade impaction methods by introducing more clinically representative mouth-throat models and inhalation profiles.

A typical setup combines:

An Alberta Idealised Throat
A breathing simulator
A mixing inlet
A Next Generation Impactor (NGI)
Appropriate flow control and vacuum equipment

Together, these components allow the performance of an inhaler to be assessed across different throat geometries and inhalation profiles while maintaining the constant flow required for calibrated impactor operation. This helps researchers explore how device, formulation and patient-related factors may influence dose delivery.

Explore systems for rAPSD assessment

2. Inhaled dissolution

Investigate what happens after deposition

APSD measurement helps assess where particles of different aerodynamic sizes may deposit within the respiratory tract. Dissolution testing provides complementary information about how the deposited drug may dissolve in the limited fluid volumes available at the deposition site.

Unlike conventional dissolution testing for oral solid dosage forms, inhaled dissolution methods must account for the small quantity of drug collected and the low fluid volumes found at the deposition site. Appropriate dose collection, membrane selection, dissolution medium, apparatus configuration and test conditions are therefore important when developing a method that is both reproducible and sufficiently discriminatory.

Comparing dissolution behaviour can help researchers investigate formulation differences, understand potential effects on local and systemic exposure and support comparative or bioequivalence studies.

Explore inhaled dissolution

Other approaches for investigating clinically relevant product performance

Beyond realistic APSD and inhaled dissolution, additional methods can help investigate specific aspects of product use and performance.

Facemask testing

For patients who use an inhaler with a facemask, factors such as fit, seal and dead space can influence the dose available for inhalation. Facemask testing helps assess product performance under more representative conditions for paediatric and other patient groups who may not use a mouthpiece directly.

View more details

Particle morphology

Particle size alone does not always explain how an inhaled product will perform. Assessing particle shape, surface characteristics and agglomeration can provide additional insight into aerosolisation, deposition behaviour and differences between test and reference products.

View more details

Cold Freon® effect

The rapid expansion and evaporation of propellant from an MDI can create a cooling sensation at the back of the throat, which may cause some patients to interrupt or alter their inhalation. Cold Freon® effect testing allows this aspect of product performance to be investigated and compared under controlled conditions.

View more details

Frequently asked questions about more clinically relevant inhaler testing

What is an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC)?

An IVIVC describes a relationship between a result measured in vitro and an aspect of product behaviour observed in vivo. For inhaled products, establishing strong correlations is challenging because drug delivery can be influenced by patient physiology, inhalation technique, disease state, device characteristics and formulation behaviour.

Does realistic APSD replace compendial APSD testing?

No. Compendial APSD methods remain important for standardised product characterisation and routine quality testing. Realistic APSD methods provide complementary information under more clinically representative conditions.

What is the difference between standard and realistic APSD?

Standard APSD testing typically uses a pharmacopoeial induction port and constant flow through the inhaler and cascade impactor. Realistic APSD introduces representative throat models and inhalation profiles, while using a mixing inlet to maintain constant impactor flow.

Why is an Alberta Idealised Throat used?

The Alberta Idealised Throat offers a more representative model of mouth-throat deposition than the standard pharmacopoeial induction port while remaining practical and reproducible for laboratory testing.

Why is a mixing inlet required?

It decouples the changing flow through the inhaler from the constant flow needed through the impactor, allowing representative inhalation profiles to be used without affecting calibrated impactor operation.

How does inhaled dissolution complement APSD measurement?

APSD characterises the aerodynamic size distribution of the emitted aerosol. Dissolution testing investigates how the collected drug dissolves after deposition. Together, they provide information about different stages of the inhaled drug-delivery process.

Are realistic APSD and dissolution required by FDA product-specific guidances?

They are included in some product-specific guidances as part of enhanced in vitro or alternative bioequivalence approaches. The exact requirements depend on the individual drug product and the current version of the relevant guidance.

Related Services