Why are more clinically relevant in vitro methods needed?

Delivered dose uniformity and APSD measurement are established methods for characterising inhaled products under standardised conditions. These methods are essential for generating repeatable and comparable data, but they do not reproduce every aspect of product use by a patient.

Differences in mouth-throat geometry, inhalation profile, device handling and the conditions encountered after deposition can all affect drug delivery and uptake. More clinically representative methods can help product developers investigate these factors, compare test and reference products under a wider range of conditions and generate data that better supports an understanding of in vivo performance.

Better IVIVCs do not replace compendial testing. They provide complementary information that can support product development, bioequivalence assessment and the interpretation of in vivo studies.

The evolving role of enhanced in vitro methods

FDA product-specific guidances for certain orally inhaled and nasal drug products increasingly reference enhanced in vitro approaches for bioequivalence assessment.

Depending on the individual guidance, these approaches may include realistic APSD measurement, inhaled dissolution testing and other product-characterisation studies. Together, they reflect a broader move towards generating more sensitive and clinically relevant in vitro evidence alongside established testing methods.

Requirements remain specific to the product and guidance concerned, so laboratories should always consult the current PSG when developing their testing strategy.

Explore the regulatory background

Improving IVIVCs

Please select an an item from below for further information about Improving IVIVC’s.

IVIVC Test Systems for DDU and APSD
Two factors have been identified as being critical to improving the clinical relevance of DDU testing and APSD measurement: realistic breathing profiles and realistic throat and nasal models.
View More Details
Inhaled Dissolution
In the case of inhaled and nasal drug delivery products, once the drug is deposited to the target site, the absorption or lung uptake, and hence the therapeutic effectiveness of the drug, depends on the active dissolving in the small amounts of aqueous fluid and lung surfactant available.
View More Details
Facemask Testing
One of the main factors influencing the amount of inhaled drug available to the patient is the interface between the facemask and the patient. Investigating and defining the effect of a facemask to the product’s DDU and APSD is important for the product development.
View More Details
Morphology
Whilst cascade impaction provides a useful indication of where inhaled drug particles are likely to deposit within the respiratory tract, it does not profile the morphological properties of these particles.
View More Details
Cold Freon® Effect
Cold Freon®” effect is the inadvertent reaction to the chilling sensation that hits the back of the throat following actuation of usually MDIs or Nasal devices.
View More Details

Frequently asked questions about clinically relevant inhaler testing

What is an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC)?

An IVIVC describes a relationship between a result measured in vitro and an aspect of product behaviour observed in vivo. For inhaled products, establishing strong correlations is challenging because drug delivery can be influenced by patient physiology, inhalation technique, disease state, device characteristics and formulation behaviour.

Does realistic APSD replace compendial APSD testing?

No. Compendial APSD methods remain important for standardised product characterisation and routine quality testing. Realistic APSD methods provide complementary information under more clinically representative conditions.

What is the difference between standard and realistic APSD?

Standard APSD testing typically uses a pharmacopoeial induction port and constant flow through the inhaler and cascade impactor. Realistic APSD introduces representative throat models and inhalation profiles, while using a mixing inlet to maintain constant impactor flow.

Why is an Alberta Idealised Throat used?

The Alberta Idealised Throat offers a more representative model of mouth-throat deposition than the standard pharmacopoeial induction port while remaining practical and reproducible for laboratory testing.

Why is a mixing inlet required?

It decouples the changing flow through the inhaler from the constant flow needed through the impactor, allowing representative inhalation profiles to be used without affecting calibrated impactor operation.

How does inhaled dissolution complement APSD measurement?

APSD characterises the aerodynamic size distribution of the emitted aerosol. Dissolution testing investigates how the collected drug dissolves after deposition. Together, they provide information about different stages of the inhaled drug-delivery process.

Are realistic APSD and dissolution required by FDA product-specific guidances?

They are included in some product-specific guidances as part of enhanced in vitro or alternative bioequivalence approaches. The exact requirements depend on the individual drug product and the current version of the relevant guidance.

Related Services