Why are more clinically relevant in vitro methods needed?
Delivered dose uniformity and APSD measurement are established methods for characterising inhaled products under standardised conditions. These methods are essential for generating repeatable and comparable data, but they do not reproduce every aspect of product use by a patient.
Differences in mouth-throat geometry, inhalation profile, device handling and the conditions encountered after deposition can all affect drug delivery and uptake. More clinically representative methods can help product developers investigate these factors, compare test and reference products under a wider range of conditions and generate data that better supports an understanding of in vivo performance.
Better IVIVCs do not replace compendial testing. They provide complementary information that can support product development, bioequivalence assessment and the interpretation of in vivo studies.
The evolving role of enhanced in vitro methods
FDA product-specific guidances for certain orally inhaled and nasal drug products increasingly reference enhanced in vitro approaches for bioequivalence assessment.
Depending on the individual guidance, these approaches may include realistic APSD measurement, inhaled dissolution testing and other product-characterisation studies. Together, they reflect a broader move towards generating more sensitive and clinically relevant in vitro evidence alongside established testing methods.
Requirements remain specific to the product and guidance concerned, so laboratories should always consult the current PSG when developing their testing strategy.
Explore the regulatory backgroundImproving IVIVCs
Please select an an item from below for further information about Improving IVIVC’s.
Frequently asked questions about clinically relevant inhaler testing
An IVIVC describes a relationship between a result measured in vitro and an aspect of product behaviour observed in vivo. For inhaled products, establishing strong correlations is challenging because drug delivery can be influenced by patient physiology, inhalation technique, disease state, device characteristics and formulation behaviour.
No. Compendial APSD methods remain important for standardised product characterisation and routine quality testing. Realistic APSD methods provide complementary information under more clinically representative conditions.
Standard APSD testing typically uses a pharmacopoeial induction port and constant flow through the inhaler and cascade impactor. Realistic APSD introduces representative throat models and inhalation profiles, while using a mixing inlet to maintain constant impactor flow.
The Alberta Idealised Throat offers a more representative model of mouth-throat deposition than the standard pharmacopoeial induction port while remaining practical and reproducible for laboratory testing.
It decouples the changing flow through the inhaler from the constant flow needed through the impactor, allowing representative inhalation profiles to be used without affecting calibrated impactor operation.
APSD characterises the aerodynamic size distribution of the emitted aerosol. Dissolution testing investigates how the collected drug dissolves after deposition. Together, they provide information about different stages of the inhaled drug-delivery process.
They are included in some product-specific guidances as part of enhanced in vitro or alternative bioequivalence approaches. The exact requirements depend on the individual drug product and the current version of the relevant guidance.
Related Services
Training
We offer a range of training courses, presentations and seminars covering a wide range of topics.
Find Out More
Servicing
A comprehensive range of both in-house and on-site product servicing options are available
Find Out More
Support
Our team of experienced technicians and engineers are on hand to help and advise
Find Out More